Monday, 19 August 2013

Colonialism: A Theoretical Perspective


         While studying the Indian National Movement, we often come across the term ‘colonialism’. It is often mentioned that the freedom struggle was directed against the colonial rule. Hence before we look into various events and aspects of the national movement it is important to understand the term ‘colonialism’ and various aspects of its nature.
             
              Colonialism is a system in which one country is subjugated by the other. The country which subjugates is referred to as the metropolis while the country which is subjugated is known as the colony. The subjugation is not only political but has economical and social dimensions.  Colonialism has been interpreted in different ways. One view is to see it as a traditional society which moves towards modernization under the colonial administrative structure. Sometimes it is seen as a transitional society; the transition being from a traditional pre-capitalist society to a modern capitalist society. These people believe that colonial societies would have graduated into modern capitalist societies had colonialism been given sufficient time. Still others believe that colonial society is a dualistic society in which the pre-modern and the modern exist side by side. Colonialism begins the task of modernization but leaves it midway leaving the process of modernization incomplete. Some writers do not prefer to go into these details and consider colonialism as nothing more than political subjugation of one country by the other.

Nature of Colonialism
            
             As can be figured from the above discussion, colonialism produces a society which is neither capitalist nor pre-capitalist. Feudal structures of the pre-colonial period under went a change but did not turn completely into capitalist. An example of this is the change in agrarian relations in India. Jagirdari system of the Mughal period gave way to the Permanent and Ryotwari settlements in the colonial period. Land became a private property and was freely brought and sold. Hence the agrarian system did not remain pre-colonial and acquired some traits of capitalism but it did not completely turn into a capitalist system.

         Colonialism was in fact a system in which two countries were involved in unequal relations. Traditional or pre-colonial structure was linked with the world economy but not independently. The link was through the metropolis as its subordinate. The colonies did not have the option of moving out of this unequal relationship which was forced through the political control of the colony by the metropolis. An important aspect of colonialism was that it had one face in the metropolis and another in colony. While it helped in development of the metropolis as a modern industrially developed country; it under developed the colony by destroying the indigenous structure and making it dependent on the metropolis. In the colony, colonialism uproots old society and economy but the change does not give way to modern industrial society and economy. The colonial structure prevents economic growth in the colony as the economic activities are undertaken not for the benefit of the colony but for that of the metropolis.

Stages of colonialism

            Colonialism and the institutions associated with it did not remain unchanged during the colonial rule. These changed with time to adjust themselves as per the needs of the metropolis. These changes can be summarized in three stages of colonialism. The first stage is known as Period of Monopoly Trade and Direct Appropriation. In India the period corresponded from 1757-1813. The British East India Company acquired a monopolistic charter from the King of England which kept other British competitors away. Competition from Indian merchants and other European companies was eliminated by way of wars and acquiring political control over the Indian states. These wars required large sums of money. Money was also needed to pay for the Indian products which were to be exported to England. In normal situation this could have been done through goods manufactured in Britain or through bullion i.e. gold and silver. However, during this period manufacturing activities in Britain had not increased to such level so as to produce goods for export to India. Export of bullion from England also did not find favour with the British. Hence, money required to buy Indian goods was obtained from direct appropriation of the revenue generated from Indian territories. Appropriation of revenue also increased the profits of the company and dividends of shareholders. This appropriation became possible when the Company acquired control, first over Bengal and then over the rest of the country. An important feature of this stage was that there no was no significant change in administration except those which facilitated appropriation of revenue like the land revenue settlements. In social fields also there were no changes. This was because colonialism of this stage could be superimposed upon the existing structures without making significant changes. There was no need to do so until revenue was successfully sucked out through traditional methods of revenue collection.

            Second stage of colonialism is the Stage of Free Trade. Britain was undergoing industrial revolution and newly emerging capitalists wanted cheap raw materials for their industries as well as a market for their ever increasing products. This group attacked the policies of East India Company and wanted the colony to serve their interests which were different from those of East India Company. This led the British Government to control the activities of the Company by enacting a number of Acts like Regulating Act of 1773 and Pit’s India Act of 1784. By 1813, when another Charter Act was passed, the Company had lost most of its political and economic power. During this stage, India was to become the subordinate trading partner of Britain by exporting agricultural products and raw materials and importing industrially manufactured goods. In this stage the colony could not be exploited under the existing socio-economic structures hence important changes were made in the administration. Policy of Laissez faire or free trade was adopted and import duties on all the goods were either removed or reduced to nominal rates. This gave the British products a free run in the country. Free entry was also given to the British capitalists to develop plantations, trade, transport, mining and other modern industry in India. Railway was also developed as a cheap mode of transport and by 1905 about 45000 kilometers of railways was laid. Legal procedures and administration also underwent a change to make it more comprehensive and elaborate. The administration now penetrated deeper into the villages and far flung areas. However legal changes were limited to criminal law, law of contract and legal procedures. Personal laws were left unchanged. Changes in Education were also introduced primarily to prepare a working force to man lower levels posts in the administration and to develop a sense of loyalty among the subjects. Earlier methods of revenue extraction also continued during this period. This coupled with costly administration and maintenance of large military establishment put severe financial constraints upon the country.

            The third stage of colonialism is known as the stage of Foreign Investments and International Competition. This stage commenced in India from about 1860s. Now other countries were being rapidly industrialized. This led to an intense search for raw materials and markets. Exploitation from colonies also accumulated large amounts of capital which was finding exclusive and safe locations to be reinvested. Hence there was a vigorous search and competition for exclusive areas for raw materials, markets and investment of capital. As the position of Britain was being constantly challenged at the international level it now made vigorous efforts to retain its hold over India. Continuation of domination over India was essential for the British to keep out rivals and for safety of British investments. Another interest was the Indian army which served the global interests of the British even when the interests of India were not affected. Due to these compulsions liberal imperialist ideology gave way to the reactionary imperialist ideology. Earlier talk of training Indians for democracy and self government were given a good bye and all efforts were made to stifle nationalist feelings.


            Thus, extraction of surplus from India continued during the entire period of British rule though its methods changed over the years. Another thing that must be kept in mind is that these stages were not strictly demarcated with respect to time i.e advent of the next stage did not mean end of the earlier stage in all spheres of administration. Two stages could exist simultaneously compounding the burden on India. The impact of British rule was disastrous for India. However, the subject will be discussed in detail in the next article. 

No comments:

Post a Comment