Thursday, 1 August 2013

Poverty Estimates for 2011-12: The Facts and the Debate (Part-I)

            On 23rd July, 2013 the Planning Commission released the data relating to poverty estimates for the year 2011-12.  The data was compiled on the basis of methodology laid down by Tendulkar Committee report which calculates poverty on the basis of Monthly Per Capita Expenditure. As per this data poverty has considerably declined from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 21.9% in 2011-12. The data fixes poverty line at Rs.816/- per capita per month in rural areas and Rs.1000/- per capita per month in urban areas. The data has been widely criticized in the media for being a statistical exercise with an insensitive and impractical approach. However, before forming an opinion on the subject it would be prudent to go into a little bit of details.

Poverty
            Literally, poverty is a condition of deprivation wherein the individual or the household is not able to meet its basic needs like adequate food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health facilities, education and entertainment. Apart from income an important aspect in this regard is the availability and access to these services as higher income may not necessarily mean access to the basic services referred above. It would also depend on availability and accessibility to these goods and services for all sections of the society.

            United Nations defines poverty as follows, ““Fundamentally, poverty is a denial of choices and opportunities, a violation of human dignity. It means lack of basic capacity to participate effectively in society. It means not having enough to feed and cloth a family, not having a school or clinic to go to, not having the land on which to grow one’s food or a job to earn one’s living, not having access to credit. It means insecurity, powerlessness and exclusion of individuals, households and communities. It means susceptibility to violence, and it often implies living on marginal or fragile environments, without access to clean water or sanitation”          
            In view of the above definition, it would be evident that poverty is multi-dimensional. Apart from inequities in income, it also means inequities in availing of facilities and opportunities and inequities in social participation. Apart from being painful to the individual, these inequities are also harmful for the society. Due to its adverse effects, poverty reduction has been one of the most important goals of various international agencies including the United Nations who adopted poverty and hunger reduction as one of the eight Millennium Development Goals in which specific targets have been set for the Governments to be achieved by 2015.

Poverty Line
            Poverty Line is an economic benchmark of income required for maintaining a minimum standard of life. International agencies had earlier set the benchmark at one dollar per day, but the World Bank has now set the benchmark at $1.25 per day. As per World Bank data, 32.7% of the Indian population was below this benchmark in the year 2010. However, many of the countries have not accepted this poverty line and various Governments have calculated their own poverty lines as per their economic conditions.

In India, the earlier official poverty line was based on per capita consumption level. This was based on a bundle of commodities which was related to the consumption corresponding to specific number of calories in the year 1973-74. The number of calories was 2400 for rural areas and 2100 for urban areas. Later poverty estimates were also broadly based on this criterion. However, this was not found to be reflecting the real situation as consumption patterns had changed over the years. Further, these poverty lines were adjusted for inflation by using different indices which caused the lines to move in different ways and it was felt these did not reflect the actual situation. Hence a need was felt to reassess the entire situation. Therefore, the Planning Commission appointed a committee in 2005 under Chairmanship of Professor Suresh Tendulkar in to revisit the entire issue. The committee submitted its report in 2009 and its recommendations were accepted by the Planning Commission.

However, many people were not in agreement with the findings of Tendulkar committee and suggested that poverty lines suggested by the Committee were too low. In view of these representations, the Planning Commission constituted one more committee in June, 2012 under the Chairmanship of Dr.C.Rangrajan to review the methodology for measurement of poverty. However, as the report of this committee will be available only in 2014, the present estimates for the year 2011-12 have been calculated on the basis of the methodology suggested in Tendulkar Committee report.

 (To be continued in Part-II)
.  
                         

             

No comments:

Post a Comment